One of my upper level classes was probably the most poorly instructed classes I have ever taken. The teacher arrived between ten and fifteen minutes late each class period, sat on a stool and read straight from a power point, and spoke only loud enough for students to know he or she was talking, but could not actually understand what was being said. The only grades were papers and attendance was not taken, meaning going to class was not at all important.
As a high school student, one would be excited about a class like this, thinking, "Woohoo, easy A." As a college student, I am disappointed. The course is one that I should know about as a future educator. In another circumstance, I think I could have enjoyed the subject, but it was not the case with the class that I had. I do not think that I learned one thing from that course. I believe it was a waste of my time and money, however it was required for my major.
To keep these kinds of classes from happening, I think the university should take a better look at who it is hiring to teach. Sometimes it seems that those in charge of new professors care more about what those instructors bring content wise and what they can do for research purposes than in the education process. I think this is a failure on Auburn's part. As a university its main goal should be to educate students and when it has professors that are failing at that task, those in leadership should evaluate why professors like that are at Auburn and what they can do to make sure every student is getting the best quality education.